Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spock
So farid and all you other anti-pak/gov whiners, where does it state that the father approved of his sons actions (if they are indeed proven to be corrupt), or whether he assisted him? Actually its more like 'baat ka batangar banana koi aap sey seekhey', you guys are so hell bent on your 'tanz' and negativity about Pakistan just because the people in power are the ones you hate, that you devoid yourself of any rationality whatsoever, similar to the fact that you were once crying about how Islamabad was made the capital by a Punjabi General. I dont know whether to laugh at you, or worry about your mental state. I wonder what happened to the people who would protest like this during the Bhutto regime like this, I can assure you they'll end up dead if they would have dared to file cases against anyone influential's puttars unlike today? From what I have heard, this CJ has done a good job, and I am sure it pains you to see any progress in the judiciary just because its happening during the Mush regime.
|
Well said Spock.
We must never forget how previous governments have intimidated, undermined and attacked previous SC Chiefs because they tried to exercise their independence. It was Nawaz Sharif who
personally lambasted CJ Sajjad Ali Shah on the floor of the National Assembly in 1997 - in violation of the constitution. That because Sajjad was challenging Nawaz's moves to create a parrallel judiciary that undermined the Supreme Court supreme authority. After months of villification of the CJ, Nawaz's goondas attacked the Supreme Court itself and forced the overthrew the Chief Justice himself, which not even Pakistan's previous rulers - democrats or dictators ever did. A truly shameful act by a Pakistani leader in our 60-year history.
This government has done some things wrong, but all Pakistani's must appreciate how they have let the judiciary become more and more independent. As I have said this very Chief Justice has passed historic judgements striking down key decisions of this government, hence it is clearly performing it's role of being a check on the excesses of the Executive. Let us applaud that, and encourage more of it, rather than personally attacking a man because of the alleged misdeeds of some of his aulad.