Quote:
|
Originally Posted by garmihawathandapaani
^ Don't you think a Chief Justice ought to be held to significantly higher standard when it comes to upholding the law? He is also in breach of not only his professional ethics but a legal requirement as well - when somebody becomes a lawyer and admtted to bar they are signing up to report and uphold. Thi sgentleman is not a mere lawyer but a judge...a CJ no less.
If he knew his son's record he should have been the first one to report it - he is required to do so under law.
|
Ok first of all, the CJ did nothing wrong, when it comes to his duty, since he isnt a policemen out to arrest people on streets. Secondly, your whole silly argument in based on the notion that his son DID infact do something wrong, which basically is against the idea of an accused man considered innocent till proven guilty. It is not a CJ's job to go around accusing people and making them stand trial, and the same applies to his son or any jamadaar in Pakistan. So unless you can prove to me that this guy was guilty and did everything right under his papa's nose, maybe then you have a point.