Quote:
|
Originally Posted by garmihawathandapaani
Spock - there are errors of commission and then that of omission. The latter is about not doing something you're supposed to do. The CJ is supposed to do something here and he hasn't.
Yes, it has to be proven that
1. CJ knew of his son's shenanigans and
2. The son committed such shenanigans
Now do you really for minute believe that either of these unlikely? Fine.
|
Ok, even though I still find is hard to grasp why you are blaming the CJ, its just a desperate attempt to malign his character, which I must say has earned a good rep.
Ok, it has yet to be proven, so ever heard the phrase innocent until proven guilty? Maybe his dad was convinced his son didnt do anything wrong? Maybe he didnt know, now dont tell me sons can hide their crimes from their dads. Lastly, a case was filed against him, so this proves you can afterall take action against an influential person's son, which is a marked improvement, and instead of appreciating this move, you guys are attacking the CJ's character.