Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince Abbas
Frozen Fire:
The objection raised is not on his being an "ummati nabi", but on his following a non-prophet, that is Imam Abu Hanifa, in the matters of fiqh.
Most followers of Qadiani here have hard time digesting that he followed Abu Hanifa, for the above obvious reason. But if Qadiani did not follow Abu Hanifa then they should produce his own work on fiqh Ahmadiyya. Unfortunately, such work is not available. This proves that Qadiani followed Abu Hanifa, who was a non prophet.
I can talk at length on this issue, but I would ask you not to digress from the topic of the thread.
Simply put, the question is: Which fiqh did Qadiani follow?
|
Please have some fear of Allah. You have been given answer to this at least half a dozen times. You keep repeating the same question again and again for the sake of attacking Ahmadiat.
Once again, he(AS) is Massih-e-Maood, and THE Jesus of the later days prophesied by Holy Prophet(SA). He is a "Umati" nabi and receive revelations from Allah. His status is above the four imams that you mention, since he(AS) was divinely appointed. So, were ever you find a contradiction between "fiqh" of imam Abu Hanifa and Masih-e-Mahood(AS), fallow the later, without any doubt. Now I understand that he might have said to follow Imam Abu Hanifa, and that you should. But if there is a contradiction, you would follow Masih-e-Maood. So when you wanna tie your arms in Salat, check what Abu Hanifa says, then check what Masih-e-Maood(AS) says, then if there is a contradiction, tie em the way Masih-e-Maood(AS) tells you to. Makes sense?
BTW I noticed you keep referring to him as only Qadiani? His name is Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (AS), and if you have hard time saying that since you are a non-believer, you can simply call him Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. you show so much hate towards a person who preached "love for all, hatred for none".