Quote:
Originally Posted by mAd_ScIeNtIsT
Pakistan's Supreme court has a nasty habit of political activism, more so than supreme courts in other countries.
At any rate, your additional questions to bob_chasm are negated by the PP article I posted, which demosntrated that at the very start of his rule he already owned more than enough assets to purchase this property in 2003.
Which then leaves the incorrect zoning issue. Let's start by hearing your case that he should not have been able to buy this property for housing.
|
My case? In case you didnt know, it was already pending a trial at a Supreme Court, before the dictator imposed the emergency. Now if you will label the supreme court as 'political activists' just because they werent Mushy's yes men, I dont think I should bother trying to put up another 'case'.
I know peace begins with me, with all I feel and with all I see. And I know it's no easy task removing our own fearful masks, but I have seen us rise and fall, stand on the moon, tear down the wall
|