Quote:
Originally Posted by ehtasab
Does the link say that Musharraf has sold these properties? When? At what prices? After getting this info we can safely establish that he must've bought this farm house after selling other properties.
|
When a State goes around looking at who owns what and asks them to justify where they got the money to buy it, it is in my opinion, a witch hunt. I would feel more comfortable if the State would provide proof of (the specific crime) that generated the money. Then, prove how someone used these funds to buy something not the other way around. Otherwise, the State is basically assuming the guy is guilty until proven innocent, because he owns something. This would be an example of big brother government gone crazy. Nobody likes to see governments exercising this kind of power. The potential for abuse by incumbent would cloud the truth. In the case of Musharraf it is clear he was persuing a policy against radical followers of Sharia. So sympathizers of radical followers of Sharia would be expected to conduct witch hunts against Musharraf. So unless you can provide specific proof of embezzlement against Musharraf taking money from government contracts, it really doesnt interest me and makes me suspicious of why someone wants to conduct a witch hunt against him.