View Single Post
Old Sep 15th, 2008, 08:25 AM   #18 (permalink)
ehtasab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 25, 2008
Posts: 4,726

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sa1eem View Post
You wrote that this article refers to the officers other than COAS in GHQ ... but it seems you did not read what I wrote. What I wrote is that ... When we say that army has decided, it means COAS has decided, and when we say that GHQ has taken decision, it means COAS has taken decision. No one in Army has any decision making authority other than COAS. Even Corps commanders and other officers take decision with permission and on behalf of COAS. No one can even question COAS not only because he is COAS but also because all other officers are lower ranking officers (Lt Generals are lower ranking to General).
Sa1eem bhai this is what you wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sa1eem View Post
because when we talk about Army we talk about Army Chief ... and when we talk about GHQ we talk about office of the Army chief. Musharraf was Army Chief ... so his person (and no one else) was not only representing Army but GHQ was his office.
In this post you are not talking about "army/GHQ/COAS has taken decision", in this post you are saying when we talk about army/COAS/GHQ they are all the same... there is a difference in "making decision" and when we refer to army, coas or GHQ!







saaray Pakistan ka ek hi naara: ehtasab ehtasab!
ehtasab is offline   Reply With Quote