Quote:
Originally Posted by psyah
Peace dk_bagga
Relativism has been eliminated from the quest of knowledge because people like Socrates have done the hard work to argue that there are absolutes in the areas you have specified as relative. Primarily that:
good for you and bad me is one option
bad for you good for me is another
But bad for both and good for both are other possibilities and based on this it is deduced that 'good' is defined by the greatest universal balance of individual goods reasoned through wisdom.
|
I agree with you, universal balance should be mentained , people doing the same by believing in god, and their religions, that is wrong, they are made to mentain this universal balance in a false way. it is true this false way is helping in metaining this balance, but not efficiently. means they are doing that without awaring about their own enjoy. they have helief in god , because they afraid of getting into hell. beacause they afraid of getting punished.
pupose of mantaining the balance of universe is being solved, but without enjoy.
good for both is the best option, becasue this increases enjoyment accornding to the theory of maximum enjoyment(
Scrutiny: Theory of maximum enjoyment).
now good for both is another option, but there is some problem, definition of "good for both" can be different for everyone. judging good for everyone is different for diiferent people. important is to judge the best option. and I believe this can be done by taking all the options in consideration. if one options is not considered then there is some fault in judgment. that is why telling or assuming only one option can be wrong. assuming only that god exists can be wring. we should go with all assumptions. and should select the apropriate options.