Arleitter

His famous invasions to India has set the foundation for the Muslim Sultanate in the Indian sub-Continent, Hindu and other Haters of him only consider him a looter, but none of them answer this question that y almost all the armies of Northern Indian Raj cannot defeat a simple looter...

.[/QUOTE]


Wrong Hanibal.That was not the case.There was nothing to mention on `all North Indian army'.During his times there ws no unified country or a system but each place was a small kingdom.Just see how Ghazni went to help Kannouj (a Hindu Kingdom),when it was attacked by Kalinjar(Another Hindu kingdom).There were nno unity among kings during those times.


I still doubt Ghzni as a ruler other than a looter.A looter who used the cover of darkness and mounted attacks on places.Just one example is ,he atatcked Somnath temple many times.Is there any logic behind the claim that the temple had been attacked many times and each time it had a cache of jewels and other precious stuffs,as if awaiting for Ghazni to come and loot it each time?Even if we buy this,is there any logic to accep that the temple authorities or it's protectors did not take any precaution to defend it?

All these show only one thing that Ghazni was a mere looter who wreaked havoc on the temple ,as a dacoit.