Quote:
Originally Posted by firenze
lets back to context, they said DON'T HOLD PUBLIC DEBATE ON IT BECAUSE IT WOULD STIGMATIZE FRANCE'S MUSLIM COMMUNITY.
whatever..
Saudia/Iran/Afghanistan & every other so-called Muslim country except Turkey/Malaysia force dress code on foreigners.. so please stop bickering.. its their country their law, you don't like it. Happily move to so-called Muslim Countries, even though in most of the Islamic nations Burkha is also not welcome anymore, people don't like it.
They BAN burkha in France not in FATA Tribal area !
Again, convey the same message to Muslim countries to stop enforcing their dress laws on non-Muslims & foreigners !
|
It's pretty clear you didn't even read my post before responding, or just couldn't understand it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplyme
I totally understand that purdah is a ticket to education and freedom for women from the conservative families. But we also would have to take into account the impact of dressing like this. From a personal experience I had a colleague who used to wear the purdah(total, even the eyes) to office. Communicating with her was a nighmare. People would like to see the face when they talk. It was as talking to an inanimate object. To make matters worse she would just nod her head instead of saying "Yes" or "No". This would become very difficult to interpret and created lot of confusion in the team.
Hence I think it is important that we understand that we live in a society and adjust accrordingly. It is not as if every other person who looks at you has lustful feelings.
|
You find her attire mildly distracting...so instead of going to the next logical step and asking her to articulate herself more clearly, you think the solution is a national law restricting her right to dress herself as she sees fit. Truly brilliant.
This is the same kind of argument people on the other end of the spectrum use to try and ban women from wearing skirts...claiming it will be to distracting/arousing for the men around them if their calves are exposed. In either case, its absurd.