GupShup Forums - View Single Post

DD · Jul 5th, 2009, 12:30 AM

I think the clerics son is saying that only attack against a combatant or armed force is justified and not the non combatant or civilian.

Jul 5th, 2009, 12:30 AM	#8 (permalink)
DD Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2, 2006 - 1:47 am Posts: 583 Blog Entries: 4	I think the clerics son is saying that only attack against a combatant or armed force is justified and not the non combatant or civilian. The one who isn't confused, does not, really understand the problem.