Gems
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 10:25 AM by ravage
Been a while. Not much has changed since, and Im not as productive as I'd thought Id be if only I gave up on GS. I guess if you wanna waste time you find other ways.
I introduced my classmate Einstein in a previous post , who frequently sends inane stuff to our alumni mailing list.
Some of the latest ones involved asking if anyone had 'really nice' contacts in british embassy, if people had the lunar and solar eclipse calendars for 2009 (why?), volunteering information about pimps in the Islamabad area in case anyone is interested (again, why?), how can i copy my sim?
I feel a bit bad because everyone starts beating on him the moment he asks one of these inane questions. They never go anywhere except a bunch of guys making wisecracks but he still persists as if we are nice decent people who will make the best effort to fix his phone after hes dunked it in water. But really the die was cast with his first two questions... is there anyone in uganda ??? and can anyone tell me the name of that cock song?
Yes I sent in my wisecrack in case you're wondering. A bit less abrasive than Im used to, because i feel guilty.
So most of you would know that our brains our comprised of millions of neurons. A neuron is kindof a little black box, with chemical/electrical inputs and outputs. You can now measure what the inputs and outputs are. Imagine (and its not a stretch) it was possible to replace one neuron with a silicon chip, just take the neuron out and put in a chip. They already do similar stuff for vision impairment for example. Would you still be you? One would think so right. But say we replace another, and another, till 20% of your brain is microchips, each programmed to just do the exact input-output the neuron used to do. Is that still a person? Imagine 60% then, imagine all the neurons are replaced with a mechanical brain. Is that still a person, or a robot in a human body?
Over the weekend my friend and I disagreed on this, I thought no this isnt a person, he said it is, and that your identity is actually in your genes. I dont see that, how can your genes be your identity thats nonsensical. But see in this scenario, you're not noticing anything. Its just one neuron at a time, and after each procedure, you have exactly the same mental output (by definition).
Strange.
and
I introduced my classmate Einstein in a previous post , who frequently sends inane stuff to our alumni mailing list.
Some of the latest ones involved asking if anyone had 'really nice' contacts in british embassy, if people had the lunar and solar eclipse calendars for 2009 (why?), volunteering information about pimps in the Islamabad area in case anyone is interested (again, why?), how can i copy my sim?
I feel a bit bad because everyone starts beating on him the moment he asks one of these inane questions. They never go anywhere except a bunch of guys making wisecracks but he still persists as if we are nice decent people who will make the best effort to fix his phone after hes dunked it in water. But really the die was cast with his first two questions... is there anyone in uganda ??? and can anyone tell me the name of that cock song?
Yes I sent in my wisecrack in case you're wondering. A bit less abrasive than Im used to, because i feel guilty.
So most of you would know that our brains our comprised of millions of neurons. A neuron is kindof a little black box, with chemical/electrical inputs and outputs. You can now measure what the inputs and outputs are. Imagine (and its not a stretch) it was possible to replace one neuron with a silicon chip, just take the neuron out and put in a chip. They already do similar stuff for vision impairment for example. Would you still be you? One would think so right. But say we replace another, and another, till 20% of your brain is microchips, each programmed to just do the exact input-output the neuron used to do. Is that still a person? Imagine 60% then, imagine all the neurons are replaced with a mechanical brain. Is that still a person, or a robot in a human body?
Over the weekend my friend and I disagreed on this, I thought no this isnt a person, he said it is, and that your identity is actually in your genes. I dont see that, how can your genes be your identity thats nonsensical. But see in this scenario, you're not noticing anything. Its just one neuron at a time, and after each procedure, you have exactly the same mental output (by definition).
Strange.
and
Total Comments 10
Comments
-
From a sociological perspective, it would even be debateable, what an identity is. I would argue, like you did, that your genes is NOT your identity except in the physical sense. There are other things that make us who we are, other than our genes and stuff.
Btw, hows it going? It seems like forever ago when we talked (or used to talk!).Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 10:39 AM by Ira
-
hello ira
i dunno, my bias is towards the brain as far as identity goes. if someone were to ask me where *I* am, I'd point to my head. but then my friend says people used to say the same about hearts before.. and now we have mechanical hearts. but then if my head can be replaced by mechanical parts, and by extension so can I, then thats very disturbing for me.
yes I went MIA from most online mediums. I dont really know why, same thing happened with friends who were on msn a program i find particularly annoying.
im okay, not much has changed for me. I follow your blog from time to time, and know a lot has for you, mashallah, in a very good way
. 
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 10:44 AM by ravage
-
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 10:44 AM by Monk
-
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 10:46 AM by ravage
-
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 10:57 AM by Monk
-
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 11:10 AM by ravage
-
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 11:16 AM by Monk
-
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 11:28 AM by ahmadjee
-
Posted Sep 29th, 2009 at 12:10 PM by belle
-
Posted Oct 1st, 2009 at 02:28 PM by ravage






gupshup
unplugged
society
services










