TeenDabbyWala

There is something called well thought out opinion, and there is something called shi**y opinion. His posts are complete sh*t, and he is just trolling to get a rise out of people. I say the same thing about Punjabee in USA. His sole purpose on this forum is to post anti-Pakistani messages, and get people to argue.

firenze

I read his posts, they are thought provoking.. one should always fought on intellectual levels. If you are having problems replying him, then better work on acquiring more knowledge/research to counter him.

that's not a way of booting off people !..

TeenDabbyWala

Yeah, I am having a real problem replying to him at his intellectual level. He is of the same breed as Moin-ul-Ateeq.

teggy

It is best to report posts that are questionable, and then moderators can undertake those and take proper action. There are a number of options available to the moderators, and each one is very effective.

Thanks for the concern though, TeenDabbyWala. We will keep a lookout.

mercenary2k

by the way mods, what happened to bitter_reality?

did he get banned?

kakaballi

Nobody forces you to reply. There's an attitude, 'ignore'. You can adopt that.

firenze

he is on long vacation ..

mercenary2k

hahahahah

when does that "vacation" end?

queer

can we get moin.ul.atiq back

TeenDabbyWala

It's not that his posts are questionable, he does subtle trolling. Sort of like some politicians or nosy aunties do. They purposely raise questions which are intended to make people argue.

teggy

I understand what you're saying, and that's precisely why reporting allows you to specify the reason when you're reporting a post. So, if the reason is valid and fits the description of the content for the reported post(s), it's as good as reporting a questionable post.

All reported posts are dealt with on a case-by-case basis. If the post is taken into review, then it will be decided on collectively by the moderators, and the most appropriate action is then taken. There have been cases where inflammatory/provocative posts have been acted on, and it still happens now. Again, it's all done on a case-by-case basis, and not every reported post will get the expected treatment. There are a few options available, and each one is very effective in its own realm of application.

Worry not, my friend. Your voice is heard loud and clear!

hanibal

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

interesting, i even don't like few members should i put my dislikes and their short-comings in public and humiliate them or start blaming them for all the wrongs on earth..

moreover, i am not surprised by the mods and admin of GS for allowing this happen right under their nose, i am sure they have reasons for this.. i mean reason for having a trial on someone in public... which should have been done in private, but who cares... if some mod wanna be/x-mod/ or TWIN of mod do not like a single poster, he have every right to do what ever he wants to do, no matter now un-ethical it is, after all , who cares about ethics or low-moral values until and unless someday it knocks our doors...

i am wondering how low it can get???

teggy

Moderators have previously been criticized openly, and that still happens. That is no problem at all; infact, constructive criticism is healthy and allows for response to pour in that can help get members' point across and point out any shortcomings.

On the same note, your points are also equally valid. And a better choice would have been to discuss this privately, but that choice is not made by a wanna be/ex-mod/or a moderator's twin, it is made by a fellow member.

I do though believe the concerns have been addressed, and for the time-being the thread has served its purpose.

The feedback/complaints/suggestions/concerns are greatly appreciated, and will not be ignored. If there are any further concerns on this specific topic, you may reach the concerned moderator(s)/Channel Manager(s)/ or the Director, TLK via PM.