Iconoclast Biased in Moderation

d-tox..ed · Jun 26th, 2009, 02:59 AM

I am very much regreting this now when RC requested to stand up against Biased Moderation of Iconoclast. The Moderator should always stay neutral to provide service to both parties equally. If he is inclined towards one group then he/she should give reasons and proofs for that.

I would like to draw TLK and Channel Manager's attention towards the following post made by Iconolast.

The original post can be found here.

My Questions:

I would like to ask Iconolast as Moderator what do you mean by flawless character? What are you refering to? You may have some incorrect information which I may be able to clarify.

I would also like to ask does he not think that this particular post was Biased? I understand the topic was getting in wrong direction.

Why was the thread closed without letting me reply to Raheel's post?

P.S - for Iconcolast...200 Million Muslims believe him to be Messiah...The rest are blind folded and perhaps for good reasons as they dont even deserve to get blessings to being part of such a blessed Jamaat.

Iconoclast · Jun 26th, 2009, 06:31 AM

Fair enough, i have edited my post to accomodate your views, but there is nothing new in Raheel's post. You were given ample time to repond to allegation that the woman in question was Na-Mehram, if you have anything to prove otheriwse, send to me and i will put it in the thread.

Simple thing is that we do not want discussions on characters. If i had seen the thread initially, i wud have closed it right away, but when i saw it several posts had already been made, so you given enough time to put ur thoughts up on teh topic.

There is no point in keeping it and if all what you wan is to be the last responder in every thread am afarid that not what we keep in mind while moderating.

hareem01 · Jun 26th, 2009, 07:31 AM

Icono is the best mod.

d-tox..ed · Jun 26th, 2009, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconoclast

Fair enough, i have edited my post to accomodate your views, but there is nothing new in Raheel's post. You were given ample time to repond to allegation that the woman in question was Na-Mehram, if you have anything to prove otheriwse, send to me and i will put it in the thread.

Simple thing is that we do not want discussions on characters. If i had seen the thread initially, i wud have closed it right away, but when i saw it several posts had already been made, so you given enough time to put ur thoughts up on teh topic.

There is no point in keeping it and if all what you wan is to be the last responder in every thread am afarid that not what we keep in mind while moderating.

I have seen the post. You are still persisting that Prophecies are not true. Tell me which Prophecy is not true? That was still a BIASED approach.

Allow me to update the above statement I made before. Perhaps I didnt read the post made by Iconoclost with full attention (Its Friday). I thought he was saying that Mirza sb (A.S) prophecies have not been fulfilled. My mistake. However still for the sake of argument which Prophecies are not proven? Perhaps you look at the Prophecies in different context then I do. It can be a good topic. We shall discuss it in Allegation thread.

d-tox..ed · Jun 26th, 2009, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hareem01

Icono is the best mod.

No doubt he is a good man and Moderator but now there has been two complaints about his dealing on the contraversial matters.

I am not asking him to stand down. As he has accepted and changed part of his reply. It is fine with me. I have no personal issue with him. Just asking him to stay neutral unless he can really put a good discussion with backed up references.

d-tox..ed · Jun 26th, 2009, 09:33 AM

Kindly close the thread I am satisfied with Iconcolast action.