Mehmood Ghaznavi - Page 7

being lonely · Sep 13th, 2009, 08:01 PM

I love the man Sultan Mehmood Ghaznavi !

being lonely · Sep 13th, 2009, 08:12 PM

What i read about somnath victory is that " Sultan Mehmood Ghaznavi chopped of the head of that idol without knowing of that its full of gold and precious and after that he found that its full of it which was looted by the Rajas and also taken from the innocent hindu villager people and donate for the Mandir "BHAINT" and that money was only used by the rajas and those who were in the charge of somnath.And after finding that the somnath idol was full of jewls Sultan Mehmood Ghaznavi give that gold directly to the innocent people and to his soldiers as "MAAL-E-GHANEEMAT" and he didnt keep a single thing of that treasure for himself. Thats all !

TLK · Sep 13th, 2009, 08:31 PM

Administrator's Warning:

Guys please stay on the topic, Do not convert a personality based discussion into religious fight

diwana · Sep 13th, 2009, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by being lonely

What i read about somnath victory is that " Sultan Mehmood Ghaznavi chopped of the head of that idol without knowing of that its full of gold and precious and after that he found that its full of it which was looted by the Rajas and also taken from the innocent hindu villager people and donate for the Mandir "BHAINT" and that money was only used by the rajas and those who were in the charge of somnath.And after finding that the somnath idol was full of jewls Sultan Mehmood Ghaznavi give that gold directly to the innocent people and to his soldiers as "MAAL-E-GHANEEMAT" and he didnt keep a single thing of that treasure for himself. Thats all !

Yes. When he was bribed not to break the idol, he refused to accept the money.

He chose to be an Idol breaker. And Lo and Behold! He found the treasure much more than he was being bribed for.
Anyone in his position would have been much more satisfied and pleased to follow his or her good instincts.

fayax · Sep 13th, 2009, 10:52 PM

Please, lets stick to historical topics/events and not current events here.

diwana · Sep 13th, 2009, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fayax

Please, lets stick to historical topics/events and not current events here.

Do you really believe Indians to stick with the the rules?

It is in their best interest to divert the discussion and not to have to comment on the historical events.

Ghaznavi was a sincere, brave, and open minded warrior. He attempted to and succeeded to destroy the political and religious control on poor people regardless of their religious background. If he hurt Muslims of different sect, then it was his conviction and we know he has already been acquitted or punished for it. We just cannot tell.

Indians and Hindus will always portray him as a negative person especially if Pakistan and Pakistani think he was a great person or name a rocket or two after him. This is just the nature of the beast acting against him!!!!

Arleitter · Sep 14th, 2009, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diwana

And my friend when you stop acting like Ayaz to Mehmud in threads as you do for the member 'Punjabee in USA' then we can discuss further. Why not just say 'yes master'? I am sure you know I can provide examples. Pleeese I insist, try me. :-)

Obviously I dont not want to `try' you

,I am not Ayaz or Ghznavi for that....

Punjabee in USA · Sep 14th, 2009, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diwana

Taking money from the looters is All Ghaznavi did indirectly. He was a idol breaker, a brave warrior who eliminated bigot Hindu Brahmans off of their positions

He was surprised to see money, jewels etc. hidden in idols. It was not the idols they were worshiping. It was not the idols they were fighting for.

Where did this treasure come from? From poor religious people.

By that same logic, Babri mosque was not being used for namaz. So it was not actually a mosque just a structure. And so demolishing it was the right thing to do, correct ?

Arleitter · Sep 14th, 2009, 11:15 AM

^Excellent one....

diwana · Sep 15th, 2009, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arleitter

Obviously I dont not want to `try' you

,I am not Ayaz or Ghznavi for that....

Why even try to clarify? Something you must?? Especially you wrote Ayaz first. :-)

diwana · Sep 15th, 2009, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Punjabee in USA

By that same logic, Babri mosque was not being used for namaz. So it was not actually a mosque just a structure. And so demolishing it was the right thing to do, correct ?

Being used for namaz or not, what does it matter?

Was it being used to make financial slavery or robbery of people?

There were no evil and devilish people stealing money from people in the name of religious charity and hiding it in so called religious structures.

The Masjid was not hurting masses and was not the center of corruption and deception like the Somnaath Mandir dude.

Wish you had some logical sense to understand.

Sorry the comparison is not even close. But off course more than Ayaz-like person would love your false argument. (Wink)