.
   
register for an account    --    


Go Back   GupShup Forums > Society > Military and Strategic Issues


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 2nd, 2009, 12:53 AM   #1 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
vigoratus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 24, 2008 - 1:37 pm
Posts: 1,294

Balanced


31 Jan 2009, 1144 hrs IST, IANS

BANGALORE: The very first communications satellite sold by the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) to the European operator Eutelsat has
failed abruptly after five weeks in orbit, in a setback to ISRO which just celebrated the 100th day of its successful moon mission.


"Scientists at ISRO are analyzing the anomaly in the hope of reviving the satellite," ISRO spokesman S. Satish said.

He said ISRO's two earlier satellites INSAT-1C and 2D had similar problems. But European analysts have told the authoritative Washington-based Space News, that the ISRO-built satellite "is likely a total loss".

The satellite W2M is the inaugural product of a Euro-Indian joint venture agreement between Antrix and Astrium Satellites of Europe signed in February 2006. It was launched Dec 20 for Paris-based Eutelsat.

"It is really unfortunate but we have to take the failure in its stride," said K.R. Sridharamurthi, executive director of Antrix, the commercial arm of ISRO. He said the confidentiality agreement with Astrium prevented him from discussing anything further about the satellite problem.

In a curt statement Eutelsat said: "The performance of the W2M satellite, which was launched on 20 December, 2008, does not comply with the requirements set with the spacecraft's manufacturer, EADS Astrium/ISRO Antrix, following a major anomaly affecting the satellite's power subsystem."

Under the agreement, Antrix and ISRO had responsibility for operating W2M during its first weeks in orbit before transferring control to Eutelsat. "The satellite had performed well during these weeks," Sridharamurthi said.

Space News quoting industry officials said there was a sudden failure of its electric-power subsystem during the night of Jan 22-23 as it was being moved from its in-orbit test location toward its final geostationary slot at 16 degrees east longitude.

While the exact cause of the W2M failure is under investigation, "it can almost certainly be traced to the Antrix-provided platform", Space News, quoting industry officials, said.

According to Space News, recovery efforts will continue as engineers seek to determine whether at least a portion of the satellite's capacity can be brought into use. "If these efforts are unsuccessful, they said, W2M's on-board thrusters will be used to guide the satellite into a so-called graveyard orbit about 300 km above the geostationary arc."

The Astrium-Antrix joint venture's ambition is to offer a relatively inexpensive alternative for customers who want satellites at the lower end of the price, power and weight range of commercial telecommunications satellites.

Eutelsat was the first customer to purchase a satellite from the Antrix-Astrium joint venture. A second satellite 'Hylas' is under construction at an ISRO centre in Bangalore for Avanti Communications Group of London and scheduled for launch late this year.

Sridharamurthi said that work on Hylas production is proceeding as scheduled and will not be affected by the W2M problem.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/I...ow/4056577.cms

Oh nooo!

What could've gone wrong? First Arjun project, then Brah-Mos, and now this...

Are any of you aware if it failed due to the incompatible specs required by Europeans, or if it was manufactured with faults?

Dear India: Don't worry yourself with advanced weapons manufacturing. Leave that to your neighbors. Concentrate on Microsoft and Cisco Systems Tech Support.







Last edited by vigoratus; Feb 2nd, 2009 at 12:59 AM..
vigoratus is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 2nd, 2009, 01:17 AM   #2 (permalink)  
Mitha Meva
 
InToXiCaTeD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 8, 2008 - 6:46 am
Posts: 1,995
Blog Entries: 1

Balanced


^^What went wrong with Arjun project??






InToXiCaTeD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2nd, 2009, 02:22 AM   #3 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
vigoratus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 24, 2008 - 1:37 pm
Posts: 1,294

Balanced


Quote:
Fourteen Arjun tanks were handed over to the Indian Army for user trials last year but were returned to the manufacturer - the Combat Vehicles Development Establishment - with a list of defects. These included a deficient fire control system, inaccuracy of its guns, low speeds in tactical areas - principally the desert - and the tank's inability to operate in temperatures over 50 degrees Celsius.

Now the Defense research organization DRDO calls for investigation on sabotage. There is no sabotage. Indian Army has denied the same. It is a just failed Indian engineering and poor quality.
http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/19807.asp

Quote:
New Delhi, April 24: After the Arjun tank failed to clear a crucial round of user trials earlier this year, the Defence Ministry has called for an inquiry to fix responsibility and examine “all possibilities” behind the poor performance of its German-origin power pack. Minister of State for Defence Rao Inderjit Singh said on Thursday that the inquiry would examine all possible reasons behind the tardy performance. The two tanks that were undergoing accelerated user trials by the army suffered engine failures on four separate occasions.
“There was no engine failure during the past 15 years. Just when we are ready to induct it, the engines of both tanks that were undergoing trials failed. We will now look into all possibilities behind the failure,” Singh told The Indian Express.
MoD calls for probe into Arjun tank failure

PS: Sorry mods, didn't mean to divert topic. Just answering the post above.






vigoratus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2nd, 2009, 03:01 AM   #4 (permalink)  
Mitha Meva
 
InToXiCaTeD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 8, 2008 - 6:46 am
Posts: 1,995
Blog Entries: 1

Balanced


Sorry I confused the name "Arjun Project" with their Moon Mission project name. Thanks for reply anyway.






InToXiCaTeD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2nd, 2009, 10:47 AM   #5 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 5, 2002 - 1:00 am
Posts: 1,214

none


WoW! they could not build a piston engine for arjunK but build satellites and rockets,, amajing absolutely amaJing!!!!!!!!!!






mo293 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2nd, 2009, 11:30 AM   #6 (permalink)  
Living In Paradigm..
 
firenze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 29, 2008 - 5:59 pm
Location: New York
Posts: 4,218

Drunk


Atleast it work for 5 weeks, better luck next time. Get more help from russian's !







I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
firenze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2nd, 2009, 11:41 AM   #7 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
zxcvb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2005 - 8:44 am
Location: Tri-State
Posts: 757

none


I think everyone who is smart should realize that 'you learn from your mistakes'.....the learning curve will always be there when you are trying to develop everything from scratch.
You learn more from analyzing your failures than your successes.






zxcvb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2nd, 2009, 06:26 PM   #8 (permalink)  
Very very senior member
 
Captain1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2004 - 7:00 am
Posts: 25,598
Blog Entries: 4

none


[mod]Thread cleaned up, anymore tangents and you will travel with your tangents out[/mod]






Captain1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3rd, 2009, 01:19 AM   #9 (permalink)  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 24, 2009 - 1:19 am
Posts: 131

none


yes it has failed and ISRO has accepted it, one should know that the satellites payload is not made by ISRO, its only job is built the satellite with is its rocket thrusters, solar pannels and and structural support and navigation for obtaining the desired orbit, "incompatible specs required by Europeans" is false because the transponders are not ISRO's.

ISRO has a good record of its satellite, only 2 of about 20 total rockets it has launched has failed, only 4 out of about 40 satellites it has made including this one has failed.






krisent is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 PM.

 
» quickie
gupshup
cafetravjok arcbaz
unplugged
all img 1 2 3
khl 1 2vidvoice
audshor 1 2
society
pamsiwa p&sr&sc&a bep&e
arts & cul
cl&lpoet 1 2
rkslife 2 3 4 5 (par)
ha&ccs&n c&itauto
features
blogsgames
gs google button
a/v chat all albums
services
supportfeed
gs newsmodrf

» regional
pakistan isb khi lhe mfg
pakistan pew lyp mux uet
united states nyc chi iah lax
india bom del bng
holland / the netherlands ams rtm zyh
saudi arabia ruh jed
england lhr
canada yyz
united arab emirates dxb
other cites of the world all other




gs radio




Powered by vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0