Dushwari

philosophy focuses much of its attention on the epistemic nature of things, and events.
the premises and conclusions, paradoxes and conundrums come about and are framed into two basic type of knowledge bases.

one is ontological which means, related to basis of existence
and the other is tautological, meaning, containing rhetorical truth.
which way do you feel that you approach things in life and also think about them. share if you like.

is there any other philosophical manner in which you think, life events and objects can be approached to ascertain or even as much as to gain insight into their being, or having had happened.

Dushwari

Code_Red

when lazy iam tautological

when in good mood then i am anti-ontological

Dushwari

makes sense, about your red codedness :>
any idea what this lazy tautological and anti-ontological might lead you to become?

psyah

Peace All

The Abrahamic Disposition works by eliminating the tangible as NOT God. It is a process of hypothesise, support, criticise and refine.

The premise needs to be upon something that can be objectively argued 'i.e. common ground', then the concepts can be developed in to interpolative and extrapolative territory.

Baseless arguments vs Circular arguments

I don't think Ibrahim (AS) began from a baseless argument. It was a conclusion that he (AS) came to. I don't think the argument we present are circular either, rather they are iterative, or sprial arguments. That upon each cycle a better and more defined solution is reached. This process I guess could be called 'guidance'.

Dushwari

Psyah,

I pray to Allah swt that Pakistani powers that be can adapt this way of thinking and working for the good of the country. That will be the best application of the logic which you have shared.

Always a pleasure to read what you write.
Best,

Dushwari