also see this
The War You Don't See on Vimeo
I think enough evidence is given in this thread and any one who is unbiased can easily identify fitna here.
ALLAH aap ko hidayat eeman o amal kay sath day or shahdat ki maqbool maut ata farmai. :)
Even if the entire clergy from Harmain to Al-Azhar to Baghdad to Banooriya create some kinds of excuse for it, it is wrong and will always be wrong. There is no technical or religious explanation for such thing.
Syrian population is not heavily salafi either, there are mix of Sufis, Wahabis and Hanafis. So I doubt that a crazy fatwa like that will be as acceptable as the western media and that minister from Africa telling us.
It could be one of the factions of rebels that a certain foreign powerhouse (neighboring countries or west who knows) support is being supplied with these women.
Who in his right mind thinking of a civil war as Jihaad and enjoying a woman that is being used by fellow militants over and over. This is 180 degree opposite to Islamic teachings. A very pathetic thing to even imagine.
Good article by one of my friends.
The Critic's Den ...: Jihad al-Nikah vs Gang-Bang in Porn IndustryQuote:
Jihad al-Nikah vs Gang-Bang in Porn Industry
There was a news circulating around that many Tunisian girls are traveling to have sex with insurgents in Syria which were raising eye brows for many. If any of such things have happened (lets assume just for the sake of argument as it could be nothing but propaganda to discredit the insurgents in the eyes of public) then justification from an Islamic perspective for this act isn't a point of concern in this article as the concept of temporary marriage does exist which could have been used by insurgents and their temporary wives in Syria.
The intriguing point rather is that the same liberals who were raising their eye brows here, never said any thing about the gang-bag thing which is common practice in porn industry. Can one imagine a women having sex with as much as 919 men in one day to create a world record (Google 'world sex records' to find out)! brothers and sisters this has happened in this world, and another women who had intercourse with 1500 people in two days time... Does the same so called liberals raise their eyebrows when hundreds of thousands of girls have sex with multiple men in porn industry in the name of gang-bag?
This duplicity is a proof that the problem of these so called liberals isn't with a women having sex with multiple men, but the pretext in which it is being justified. When its porn industry then its OK because it's 'freedom of expression', and stakes of millions of dollars (if not billions) are involved, but when a similar thing is done by some insurgents (assuming that they have) fighting in the name of Islam, then boy you would hear lots of liberals saying 'what the f..k is going on'...
Thats just not it, women in the name of self-determination are allowed to bear the burden of raising many children alone out of wedlock, while facing the humiliation of competition in the job market to survive financially; and when their skin is sold and their figures objectified in the advertisement industry, and what not... but all of this is considered OK primarily because its all being done in the name of freedom of expression and right of self-determination, etc.
But so called liberals with their chicken hearts and a hypocritical attire (which they shamefully deny) never gather enough guts to openly denounce religion, rather prefer to attack various seemingly absurd things happening in the name of religion, but when they do so they forget what's really happening in their own backyards.
Those Muslims who take the position of apologists in such propaganda must rather counter this by showing the liberals their own face when they pretend to lecture on morality and values.
i hope all those jihad an nikah multis like makrani are still active. :)