.
   
register for an account    --    


Go Back   GupShup Forums > Society > World Affairs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 15th, 2008, 04:31 PM   #41 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2005 - 7:29 pm
Posts: 2,401

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by mo293 View Post
.............. Its like bhains ke aage been bajana.. ............

Exactly my point!!






deedawar is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 15th, 2008, 08:00 PM   #42 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 28, 2008 - 11:54 am
Posts: 1,838

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by deedawar View Post
India created a terrorist organization knowingly to control and punish another country for supporting Pakistan and to control its south eastern territory. Pakistan did not inend to control ANY country.

Pakisan did what was necessary to clear and ward off a communist country to control another country.

Not clear enough? Tough luck! Please attend an English language class.

That would be the seventh time you have repeated that ...... i have shown you links and papers which needs no further explanation .... so you can parrot the line again and keep hoping.

What is the connection on this board with English language ..... you seem to have a colonial hangover ...... knowing english language does not necessarily make you a logical person ......

As for Pakistan clearing and warding off a communist country ...... well you must be dreaming ....... if US did not have your back ... they would have landed in Islamabad .....

I can spend a lot of my time replying here ...... you see i have no issues with bandwidth ...... it might be an issue in Pakistan :biggthumb






aam bandha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15th, 2008, 09:20 PM   #43 (permalink)  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 8, 2008 - 5:37 pm
Posts: 52

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by deedawar View Post
India created a terrorist organization knowingly to control and punish another country for supporting Pakistan and to control its south eastern territory. Pakistan did not inend to control ANY country.

Pakisan did what was necessary to clear and ward off a communist country to control another country.

Not clear enough? Tough luck! Please attend an English language class.


ward of a communist country? shhhhh! not so loud! Uncle Chin may hear that!






Shogun Ninjuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 16th, 2008, 09:01 AM   #44 (permalink)  
Administrator GupShup
 
teggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 15, 2007 - 3:53 am
Posts: 15,425
Blog Entries: 13

Cool


Guys, there's no denying that Pakistan did indeed play a part in the making of now known 'Taliban', back then they were known as Mujahideen (i.e. Freedom Fighters). But you must also understand and acknowledge that it was not Pakistan's idea to create Taliban from scratch. Uncle Sam wanted to support them against the Soviets, and it did indeed flow lots of cash and advanced weapons to the mujahideen, which hurt soviets badly. It was the American Stinger launchers which brought down a countless number of low flying fighters, and choppers. After which Soviet soldiers refused to fly low for the fear of being shot down.

Saudi Arabia ofcourse was as equal a partner in helping the Mujahideen as the U.S. For every dollar US funded, Saudis contributed double that. Least to say, US might have provided the then Mujahideen and today's "Taliban" with intel as well as the know-how.

To consolidate the entire blame on Pakistan and not look to the other players who fostered the idea and used Pakistan as a route-stop, is not only irresponsible, but a plain lie.

After the soviets abandoned their ambitions to occupy Afghanland, U.S. soon pulled back all the support with the purpose having been served. This is where Pakistan's role became that much more central because Pakistan was the home to countless number of Afghan refugees, as well as base of continued support to reconcile the country which had been war-torn. US should have been there to pick up the tab and help in restoring democracy and bringing Just Rule to the land they sort of helped "liberate" indirectly. Because US turned its back on Afghans, Pakistan could not. It was a neighbor and a brotherly nation of the same faith with a rich history of trade routes which tied the two nations together.

What is happening today is outright retaliation for the abandonment of Aghans in the 80's by the US, not only that, get this, and this is real rich. US, the back then mujahideen supporter, is now itself aiming at occupying Afghanistan. Deja vu?

Lets look at all the facts, even the bitter ones that some of us may have trouble talking about, instead of finding the easy scapegoat 'Pakistan'.....








Quod mi nutrit mi distruit!
Laa raiba feehi!
teggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 16th, 2008, 01:29 PM   #45 (permalink)  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 8, 2008 - 5:37 pm
Posts: 52

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by teggy View Post

After the soviets abandoned their ambitions to occupy Afghanland, U.S. soon pulled back all the support with the purpose having been served. This is where Pakistan's role became that much more central because Pakistan was the home to countless number of Afghan refugees, ....
I think your recount of how Taleban came about is fair. But from the highlighted section is where IMO Pakistan made huge huge mistakes.

What did the govt of Pakistan do at that point to disband the so called 'mujahideen'? NOTHING. Instead ISI was actively using them as field force, with fond hopes of tearing Kashmir apart from India.

If it was merely a question of handling the cost of sustaining the refugees, it would have been straight forward. But Govt of Pakistan could never bring itself (even today) to separate itself from militant terrorists because they needed thsn in Kashmir!






Shogun Ninjuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 17th, 2008, 01:21 AM   #46 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2005 - 7:29 pm
Posts: 2,401

none


^What is this got to do with Kashmir issue at all?

Please try to make sense.






deedawar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 17th, 2008, 01:27 AM   #47 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2005 - 7:29 pm
Posts: 2,401

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by aam bandha View Post
That would be the seventh time you have repeated that ...... i have shown you links and papers which needs no further explanation .... so you can parrot the line again and keep hoping.

What is the connection on this board with English language ..... you seem to have a colonial hangover ...... knowing english language does not necessarily make you a logical person ......

As for Pakistan clearing and warding off a communist country ...... well you must be dreaming ....... if US did not have your back ... they would have landed in Islamabad .....

I can spend a lot of my time replying here ...... you see i have no issues with bandwidth ...... it might be an issue in Pakistan :biggthumb

I have no shame of saying the truth the hundred times.

India created a terrorist organization from very beginning and knowingly commited human atrocities and crime against humanity. This even made India lose its own prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. Indians may not care about it but LTTE (Sri Lankan Tigers)was created by India and eventually haunted India for its bad intention.

Pakistan did what it had to do with no other choice to ward off a communist country from Afghanistan.

You yourself mentioned US would have landed in Islamabad if Pakistan had not done what it did.






deedawar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 18th, 2008, 11:49 PM   #48 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2005 - 7:29 pm
Posts: 2,401

none


^I meant to say "As you yourself mentioned, Russians would have landed in Pakistan if Pakistan had not done what it did".






deedawar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19th, 2008, 10:29 PM   #49 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 28, 2008 - 11:54 am
Posts: 1,838

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by deedawar View Post
I have no shame of saying the truth the hundred times.

India created a terrorist organization from very beginning and knowingly commited human atrocities and crime against humanity. This even made India lose its own prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. Indians may not care about it but LTTE (Sri Lankan Tigers)was created by India and eventually haunted India for its bad intention.

Pakistan did what it had to do with no other choice to ward off a communist country from Afghanistan.

You yourself mentioned US would have landed in Islamabad if Pakistan had not done what it did.
Well Pakistan lost Benazir to Taleban .... she was instrumental in creating them .... along with her close to a 1000 security personal have been killed by Taliban symphatizers.... so it is pay back time for the Paksitan military establishment.

If you dont know the difference between the Mujahedins and Taleban, then you really dont know what is happening in Afghanistan. Taleban as a force came up after the Russians had left Afghanistan. Infact it is Mulalh Omar who himself had said that he wanted to save Afghanistan from the so called "Mujahid" ...... so go figure it out for yourself.






aam bandha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 20th, 2008, 12:11 AM   #50 (permalink)  
Junior Member
 
Ice Cold Water Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 15, 2008 - 10:09 pm
Posts: 21

none


LTTE is less than a tiny scratch for India whereas the taleban, al quaeda and even isi have become humngous frankensteins for Pakistan. Drawing a paralell between the two in this respect is dumb






Ice Cold Water Burns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 20th, 2008, 12:19 AM   #51 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 5, 2002 - 1:00 am
Posts: 1,214

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice Cold Water Burns View Post
LTTE is less than a tiny scratch for India whereas the taleban, al quaeda and even isi have become humngous frankensteins for Pakistan. Drawing a paralell between the two in this respect is dumb


Forget about LTTE, you should worry about your own home grown frankensteins...


New Delhi - As the situation goes, most of the districts in India are under the grip of Naxalites. This is a great concern for all states of the country. Over 160 districts are reported to be slipping away from the State's control and the Naxalites are becoming the masters. They are believed to be aided by vested interests outside the country.

Manmohan Singh said a few words that the ever-growing menace of Naxalism has become national concern. He said in plain words, " it has become the most serious internal security threat". Specifically he added :






mo293 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 20th, 2008, 12:28 AM   #52 (permalink)  
Junior Member
 
Ice Cold Water Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 15, 2008 - 10:09 pm
Posts: 21

none


sure sure, we always have had these communits and naxalites and what not. You have to remember we are several times bigger than you in every progressive respect but when it comes to this sort of negatives groups such as terrorists, if you count the problems you have they dominate.






Ice Cold Water Burns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23rd, 2008, 11:43 PM   #53 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2005 - 7:29 pm
Posts: 2,401

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by aam bandha View Post
Well Pakistan ..........out for yourself.
No comment on your illogical statements.

Seed and fruit are different...






deedawar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23rd, 2008, 11:49 PM   #54 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2005 - 7:29 pm
Posts: 2,401

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice Cold Water Burns View Post
LTTE is less than a tiny scratch for India .................this respect is dumb

You said India can lose its prime minister just by even less than a tiny scratch!!? Like the one you do after a mosquito bite?






deedawar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24th, 2008, 12:16 PM   #55 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 28, 2008 - 11:54 am
Posts: 1,838

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by deedawar View Post
.

Seed and fruit are different...

From the Bible, Galatians VI
Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap






aam bandha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24th, 2008, 01:14 PM   #56 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2005 - 7:29 pm
Posts: 2,401

none


^ True indeed.






deedawar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.

 
» quickie
gupshup
cafetravjok arcbaz
unplugged
all img 1 2 3
khl 1 2vidvoice
audshor 1 2
society
pamsiwa p&sr&sc&a bep&e
arts & cul
cl&lpoet 1 2
rkslife 2 3 4 5 (par)
ha&ccs&n c&itauto
features
blogsgames
gs google button
a/v chat all albums
services
supportfeed
gs newsmodrf

» regional
pakistan isb khi lhe mfg
pakistan pew lyp mux uet
united states nyc chi iah lax
india bom del bng
holland / the netherlands ams rtm zyh
saudi arabia ruh jed
england lhr
canada yyz
united arab emirates dxb
other cites of the world all other




gs radio




Powered by vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0