.
   
register for an account    --    


Go Back   GupShup Forums > Society > World Affairs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 26th, 2009, 01:59 PM   #161 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


The only valuable point is this extremely aam bhands post...
"The Government of INDIA and the Government of Pakistan reaffirm their wish that the future status of the State of Jammu and Kashmir shall be DETERMINED in ACCORDANCE WITH THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE and to that end, upon acceptance of the Truce Agreement both Governments agree to enter into consultations with the Commission to determine fair and equitable conditions whereby such free expression will be assured."

Wonder whatever happened to the this issue... They essence of the truce meant that ultimately the people of Kashmir would have the genuine right to choose their own fate. So the Indians, knowinghow much they are hated in the valley, bring up non issues to undermine the spirit of the entire agreement.

A better question now would be to ask, if the entire area were demilitarized today, why wouldnt India be ready to finally allow the people to choose?!?!

Fact of the matter is that considering Indias expansionist behavior, no one could reasonably assume that they wouldnt take the advantage and invade Azad Kashmir aswell. And from their behavior since the resolution was passed, its obvous they never had an intention of allowing the Kashmiris their rights...






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 26th, 2009, 02:13 PM   #162 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by hollowman View Post
yaar tu kab sudhrega kabhi tu kahta hai ki "you r terrorists" kabhi laaloo ki tarha rota rahta hai "Humka Kashmir daido, Humka Kashmir daido", and You Indians, when will you learn to help him, ek bacha rota rahta hai aur tum use aur pareshaan karte ho just help him to get his Indian Visa cleared so he can enjoy our Kashmir beauty, Medi I'm here with you for you always like Delhi Police, just pm me your details including your passport photocopy I do my best to get your visa cleared, tu mera acha bhai hai
I honestly dont know what you jus said in this long winded ramble.

Ummm I read something aout a visa, but I cant possibly vacation in an occupied territory, especially one thats been turned into an Indian piss pot by countless thousands of Indian terrorists. So its great for Indians themsevles as their used to living ina piss pot, but not for normal people.
The valley was beautiful once im sure, but India has destroyed it unfortunately.


I would however apply for a visa to take part in one of the protests, just so I can stomp on the gay tricolors of India Seems Protests are so common these dys just about any time is good to join one


And yes, even though I think India is morally degenerate, deluded, arrogant and generally disgusting, your ok!






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2009, 02:18 PM   #163 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Punjabee in USA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 12, 2008 - 9:32 pm
Location: Minneapolis, USA
Posts: 3,377

Sporty


Quote:
Originally Posted by Med911 View Post
The only valuable point is this extremely aam bhands post...
So now you have resorted to twisting people's nicks....you are really pathetic !!






Punjabee in USA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2009, 02:23 PM   #164 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by aam bandha View Post
Unfortunately Janab has no say in the demilitirization process .... the resolution for this clearly states ......
...
Continue to make excuses. Unfortunately, you dont have any sayy in terms of whether the people of Kashmir have a right to choose.
Ground reality is this, it wasnt an excuse, India CAN NOT be trusted.
Fact of the mater is that tribals were evacuated. But the Pak Army couldnt leave without proper assurance that the India Army was on its muzzle, because there was no defense on the ground to allow defense of Azad Kashmir. India simply used this as an excuse to deny the people their right.

Again, India refused to have mutual demilitrization... Why?

The reason is they had hoped to walk in and capture all of Kashmir.

And now they simply use diversion to undermine the actual spirit of the agreement.

The bottom line here is, do you believe that the Kashmiri people have a right to decide their own fate. You obviously dont, and hence you are contradicting the spirirt of the agreement.
If you actually agree with resolution, then ultimately the Kashmiri people do have a right to decide. And so the question is, if the Kashmir were demilitarized why woulnt the Kashmiri have their say?






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2009, 03:21 PM   #165 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
hollowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 21, 2006 - 2:15 pm
Location: Hollowland
Posts: 7,986

Aggressive


Quote:
Originally Posted by mYsTeRiOuS_gUy View Post
How do the INDIANS get away with abusive posts here????
Hollowman tou apnay baap ki jageer samajah k bakwas kar raha hai.
yeh bihari ki tarha "tou tou" kya kar raha hai tujhe urdu nahi aati kya Bur-bakh, jaa first go and learn your national language, aur haan Kashmir humaar baap ki jaageer hai, jaa mai tujhe Invite nahi karta in our Kashmir, Rota rah rondu .... Medi you are welcome







भारत ने वर्ल्ड कप फाइनल में पाकिस्तान को धोया
hollowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2009, 03:23 PM   #166 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Punjabee in USA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 12, 2008 - 9:32 pm
Location: Minneapolis, USA
Posts: 3,377

Sporty


Quote:
Originally Posted by hollowman View Post
aur haan Kashmir humaar baap ki jaageer hai, jaa mai tujhe Invite nahi karta in our Kashmir, Rota rah rondu ....


Brilliant






Punjabee in USA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27th, 2009, 12:49 PM   #167 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
janab-e-ali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 4, 2005 - 12:43 am
Location: usually somewhere between srinagar and san francisco
Posts: 1,422

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by Punjabee in USA View Post
Virtually synonymous ? How conveniently you ignore the existence of Hindu Kashmiri pandits. But how can I expect any better from you ?
All your whining doesn't change the fact that the overwhelming majority of Kashmiris are Muslims.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punjabee in USA View Post
400,000 Kashmir pundits were forced out.
A wanton, statistically impossible lie.

According to the 1981 census (the last cenus carried out by the occupation government prior to the Pandit migration) there were a grand total of 124,078 Pandits in the entire Kashmir Valley. Their population did not magically triple in eight years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punjabee in USA View Post
You are quick to point out 200 deaths, which by the way this website claims is 1100. Should one believe you or the Kashmir pundits ?
Again, its not me, its your own occupation government.

According to official government reports, a grand total of 209 Pandits have been killed from 1989-2008. I imagine that figure also includes Pandits who were killed by Indian troops in some of the large scale massacres, as well as targeted killings of Pandits sympathetic to the independence movement. If anything, the government's interest lies in exaggerating the number of Pandit deaths, as it allows them to justify the subsequent massacre of Muslims to bigoted simpletons like yourself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punjabee in USA View Post
Not all Hindus/Muslims moved out voluntarily in 1947. Most of them were forced out by thugs on both side who felt the area belonged to them since they were the majority community.
I never claimed they moved voluntarily. I said that their migration, although unfortunate, was more consistent with the ideology of Partition - minority populations leaving for areas where their communities were the majority.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punjabee in USA View Post
And the question here is not about expelling the majority community - its about providing anti-nationals (who are a minority in India) the choice to move out. You don't like India & Indians, then get out !!
The majority of Kashmiris want India out. Again, its amazing how two-faced Indians like yourself pretend to be a champion of the masses when you see a chance to destablize a country you don't like (as in Iran), but when it comes to the will of the masses in Kashmir, you show your true bigoted colors.






janab-e-ali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27th, 2009, 01:54 PM   #168 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by janab-e-ali View Post
All your whining doesn't change the fact that the overwhelming majority of Kashmiris are Muslims.


A wanton, statistically impossible lie.

According to the 1981 census (the last cenus carried out by the occupation government prior to the Pandit migration) there were a grand total of 124,078 Pandits in the entire Kashmir Valley. Their population did not magically triple in eight years.


Again, its not me, its your own occupation government.

According to official government reports, a grand total of 209 Pandits have been killed from 1989-2008. I imagine that figure also includes Pandits who were killed by Indian troops in some of the large scale massacres, as well as targeted killings of Pandits sympathetic to the independence movement. If anything, the government's interest lies in exaggerating the number of Pandit deaths, as it allows them to justify the subsequent massacre of Muslims to bigoted simpletons like yourself.


I never claimed they moved voluntarily. I said that their migration, although unfortunate, was more consistent with the ideology of Partition - minority populations leaving for areas where their communities were the majority.


The majority of Kashmiris want India out. Again, its amazing how two-faced Indians like yourself pretend to be a champion of the masses when you see a chance to destablize a country you don't like (as in Iran), but when it comes to the will of the masses in Kashmir, you show your true bigoted colors.
Wow.. Excellent rebuttal to "punjabees" otherwise trite and biased argument.

For future refrence Punjabee, if you want to convince anyone, you should choose non biased sites like the ones that were provided here






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27th, 2009, 04:52 PM   #169 (permalink)  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 24, 2009 - 12:01 pm
Posts: 12

none


My favoured solution for selfish purposes and the best one- Northern Areas, Azad Kashmir, Kashmir valley to Pakistan. Jammu and Ladakh to India. Siachen Glacier vacated. Aksai Chin- not sure.

Most likely- Azad Kashmir and Kashmir valley 'autonomous' but India and Pakistan can share resources together, NA to Pak, Jammu and Ladakh to India. Demiliatarise most areas and render LoC irrelevant






shikara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27th, 2009, 11:34 PM   #170 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by shikara View Post
My favoured solution for selfish purposes and the best one- Northern Areas, Azad Kashmir, Kashmir valley to Pakistan. Jammu and Ladakh to India. Siachen Glacier vacated. Aksai Chin- not sure.

Most likely- Azad Kashmir and Kashmir valley 'autonomous' but India and Pakistan can share resources together, NA to Pak, Jammu and Ladakh to India. Demiliatarise most areas and render LoC irrelevant
Sounds great, but India would never allow it as they refuse to even admit that Kashmir isnt a part of India...






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 03:20 AM   #171 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
hollowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 21, 2006 - 2:15 pm
Location: Hollowland
Posts: 7,986

Aggressive


^ that is why It is called Indian Kashmir






hollowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 08:11 AM   #172 (permalink)  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 24, 2009 - 12:01 pm
Posts: 12

none


Kashmir= Kashmir valley and Azad Kashmir. Northern Areas, Jammu and Ladakh not strictly Kashmir.

As somebody with Kashmiri mother, I would like the first solution I proposed but would not be against the second one. I think Pak and India were close to second one but India kept on backing out at last minute AND Mush was impeached just as we were getting closer






shikara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 11:25 AM   #173 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
janab-e-ali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 4, 2005 - 12:43 am
Location: usually somewhere between srinagar and san francisco
Posts: 1,422

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by shikara View Post
My favoured solution for selfish purposes and the best one- Northern Areas, Azad Kashmir, Kashmir valley to Pakistan. Jammu and Ladakh to India. Siachen Glacier vacated. Aksai Chin- not sure.
That certainly isn't what the people of Kashmir want.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shikara View Post
Kashmir= Kashmir valley and Azad Kashmir. Northern Areas, Jammu and Ladakh not strictly Kashmir.
Not quite.

Azad "Kashmir" was carved out of the Jammu region...the people speak Potohari/Mirpuri and Pahari, not Koshur.






janab-e-ali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 11:35 AM   #174 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2009 - 10:33 pm
Posts: 505

none


There will be no justice given to Kashmiris unless Bharat changes attitude.







http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=24532
Saudi charity funds al-Qaeda linked Pak terror outfits
khoji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 02:42 PM   #175 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by hollowman View Post
^ that is why It is called Indian Kashmir
Only by delusional Indians.. But anyone who counts calls it India occuupied Kashmir and AZAD KASHMIR!






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 02:48 PM   #176 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by janab-e-ali View Post
That certainly isn't what the people of Kashmir want.


Not quite.

Azad "Kashmir" was carved out of the Jammu region...the people speak Potohari/Mirpuri and Pahari, not Koshur.
Yes, but arent Azad Kashmir and the Valley now the main areas of contention? As far as I know, Jammu and Ladhk are content to be Indian, while Northern areas are content to remain Pakistanis, although they would have to be turned into a province officially.

Although even in Azad Kashmir there is a large number of people who would prefer to remain Pakistani or become Pakistani depending on how you look at it.






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 02:57 PM   #177 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 28, 2008 - 11:54 am
Posts: 1,832

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by Med911 View Post
Only by delusional Indians.. But anyone who counts calls it India occuupied Kashmir and AZAD KASHMIR!
OOps reality check ......now the press in Pakistan has started calling "Indian Kashmir" as ........ "Indian administered Kashmir" .... mind you this is an editorial .... so no cut paste logic here ..... guess they are trying to bring people like you to reality ....

DAWN.COM | Provinces | Kashmir to Karachi

Violence in Kashmir has become depressingly familiar over the last two decades. But the violence has been along the Line of Control or Indian-administered Kashmir.






aam bandha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 03:07 PM   #178 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
janab-e-ali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 4, 2005 - 12:43 am
Location: usually somewhere between srinagar and san francisco
Posts: 1,422

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by Med911 View Post
Yes, but arent Azad Kashmir and the Valley now the main areas of contention? As far as I know, Jammu and Ladhk are content to be Indian, while Northern areas are content to remain Pakistanis, although they would have to be turned into a province officially.

Although even in Azad Kashmir there is a large number of people who would prefer to remain Pakistani or become Pakistani depending on how you look at it.
My point was regarding ethnicity...in terms of ethnicity and culture, it is incorrect to lump Azad Kashmir together with Kashmir. It would technically be more correct to refer to the area as Azad Jammu or something along those lines (the official name is Azad Jammu & Kashmir).

In any case, I don't think anyone has ever specifically asked the people of Azad Kashmir what they want. However, judging from the fact that there hasn't been any major anti-Pakistan uprising in the area, and the fact that it is one of the biggest recruitment grounds for the Pakistani military, it would seem that the people are relatively happy remaining in Pakistan.

I think the only major area of contention at this point is Kashmir and a few adjacent areas in Jammu where Kashmiris have traditionally formed the majority of the population.






janab-e-ali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 11:32 PM   #179 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by aam bandha View Post
OOps reality check ......now the press in Pakistan has started calling "Indian Kashmir" as ........ "Indian administered Kashmir" .... mind you this is an editorial .... so no cut paste logic here ..... guess they are trying to bring people like you to reality ....

DAWN.COM | Provinces | Kashmir to Karachi

Violence in Kashmir has become depressingly familiar over the last two decades. But the violence has been along the Line of Control or Indian-administered Kashmir.
Pakistani editors are rather generous...

I think they are refering to Indian administration of Human rights violations. Such as murder, rape, dissappreances etc.

Rather clever way of keeping the peace while still implying India negative role in Kashmir...
I guess your just not smart to pick up on it...






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28th, 2009, 11:40 PM   #180 (permalink)  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2008 - 4:51 am
Posts: 1,580

none


Quote:
Originally Posted by janab-e-ali View Post
My point was regarding ethnicity...in terms of ethnicity and culture, it is incorrect to lump Azad Kashmir together with Kashmir. It would technically be more correct to refer to the area as Azad Jammu or something along those lines (the official name is Azad Jammu & Kashmir).

In any case, I don't think anyone has ever specifically asked the people of Azad Kashmir what they want. However, judging from the fact that there hasn't been any major anti-Pakistan uprising in the area, and the fact that it is one of the biggest recruitment grounds for the Pakistani military, it would seem that the people are relatively happy remaining in Pakistan.

I think the only major area of contention at this point is Kashmir and a few adjacent areas in Jammu where Kashmiris have traditionally formed the majority of the population.
My interaction has been mostly with Mirpuris and small number of Rawalakoti's.
Many Mirpuris are vehemently Pakistani. Although there are many who would still choose independance.






Med911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.

 
» quickie
gupshup
cafetravjok arcbaz
unplugged
all img 1 2 3
khl 1 2vidvoice
audshor 1 2
society
pamsiwa p&sr&sc&a bep&e
arts & cul
cl&lpoet 1 2
rkslife 2 3 4 5 (par)
ha&ccs&n c&itauto
features
blogsgames
gs google button
a/v chat all albums
services
supportfeed
gs newsmodrf

» regional
pakistan isb khi lhe mfg
pakistan pew lyp mux uet
united states nyc chi iah lax
india bom del bng
holland / the netherlands ams rtm zyh
saudi arabia ruh jed
england lhr
canada yyz
united arab emirates dxb
other cites of the world all other




gs radio




Powered by vBulletin - Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0